|
Download Page
(a) Outbreak at a flower show (den Boer et al., 2002) [1]
|
|
|
Confirmed case: radiologically-confirmed pneumonia in a visitor to the
exhibition or a member of the exhibition staff, with onset no earlier than
February 19, 1999, and no later than March 21, 1999, as well as laboratory
evidence of Legionella pneumophila infection. Laboratory evidence
included isolation of L. pneumophila from respiratory secretions,
detection of L. pneumophila antigens in urine, or a fourfold or higher
rise in antibody titers to L. pneumophila in paired acute- and
convalescent-phase sera, as reported by clinicians.
|
|
|
|
Probable case: radiologically-confirmed pneumonia with onset no earlier
than February 19, 1999, and no later than March 21, 1999, in an exhibition
visitor or a member of the exhibition staff who did not meet laboratory
criteria for a confirmed case, but who had no laboratory evidence of
infection by other microorganisms.
|
|
(b) Community outbreak linked to cooling towers (Nguyen et al , 2006)
[2]
Confirmed case: a person who (1) had radiologically-confirmed pneumonia
and laboratory evidence of infection with Legionella pneumophila
serogroup 1 (Lp-1) (i.e. , isolation of Lp-1 from respiratory
secretions, detection of Lp-1 antigens in urine, or a minimum of a 4-fold
increase [to _128] in antibody titers to Lp-1), (2) became ill between 1
November 2003 and 31 January 2004, and (3) lived in or visited Harnes or its
neighbouring communes during the 10 days before the illness. Persons who had
been hospitalised or travelling continuously outside of the community during
the 10 days before the illness were excluded.
|
|
(c) Cooling tower as source of outbreak (Kirrage et al., 2007)
[3]
Confirmed case clinical diagnosis of pneumonia, with date of onset after
1st October 2003 and lived in, worked in or had visited Hereford within 2
weeks of the date of onset of their disease. Isolation of Legionella
species from clinical specimens; or a four-fold or greater increase in the
titre of serum antibodies against L. pneumophila serogroup by indirect
immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT); or the detection of Legionella
antigens in urine.
|
|
Most outbreak investigators describe both "confirmed" and "probable" cases within their case
definition. It may not be feasible to use confirmed cases only - if there is a delay in
identifying the outbreak and necessary samples have not been collected, the numbers of
laboratory-confirmed cases may be low.
- DEN BOER J. W, YZERMAN P. F.E., SCHELLEKENS J., LETTINGA K. D, BOSHUIZEN H. C, VAN
STEENBERGEN J. E, BOSMAN A., VAN DEN HOF S., VAN VLIET H. A, PEETERS M. F., VAN KETEL R. J.,
SPEELMAN P., KOOL J.L., & CONYN VAN SPAENDONCK M. A. E. (2002) A large outbreak of
Legionnaires' disease at a flower show, the Netherlands, 1999 Emerging Infectious Diseases
8(1), pp.37-43 http pdf
- NGUYEN T. M. N., ILEF D., JARRAUD S., ROUIL L., CAMPESE C., CHE D., HAEGHEBAERT S., GANIAYRE
F., MARCEL F., ETIENNE J. & DESENCLOS J.C. (2006) A community-wide outbreak of Legionnaires'
disease linked to industrial cooling towers: How far can contaminated aerosols spread? Journal
of Infectious Diseases 193, pp.102-111 http
- KIRRAGE D., REYNOLDS G., SMITH G.E. & OLOWOKURE B; HEREFORD LEGIONNAIRES' OUTBREAK
CONTROL TEAM (2007) Investigation of an outbreak of Legionnaires' disease: Hereford, UK 2003
Respiratory Medicine 101(8), pp.1639-1644 http
|